<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Tamara Beetham — Publications</title><description>Peer-reviewed publications by Tamara Beetham, PhD, MPH on health economics, healthcare access, and addiction treatment policy.</description><link>https://www.tamarabeetham.com/</link><language>en-us</language><item><title>Medicare Appointment Availability and Wait Times Vary Considerably Across Four Large US Urban Markets</title><link>https://www.tamarabeetham.com/publications/medicare-appointment-availability-and-wait-times-vary-considerably/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.tamarabeetham.com/publications/medicare-appointment-availability-and-wait-times-vary-considerably/</guid><description>We posed as new Medicare patients calling 444 primary care clinics across Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, and Portland to measure who could actually get an appointment. Acceptance ranged from 97% in Los Angeles to just 35% in Portland, with median wait times spanning 8 to 61 days. Larger multi-site practices and hospital-system-affiliated clinics were the least accessible, suggesting that consolidation may be reshaping primary care access in ways that warrant closer policy attention.</description><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><doi>10.1093/haschl/qxag054</doi><category>Medicare</category><category>primary care access</category><category>audit study</category><category>secret shopper</category><category>health system consolidation</category><category>wait times</category><category>industrial organization</category><category>health services research</category><author>Beetham T, Marsh T, Barnett ML, Aaron RM, Greenberg E, Do Alexandra, Zhu JM</author></item><item><title>Private Equity Acquisition and Buprenorphine Prescribing</title><link>https://www.tamarabeetham.com/publications/private-equity-acquisition-and-buprenorphine-prescribing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.tamarabeetham.com/publications/private-equity-acquisition-and-buprenorphine-prescribing/</guid><description>Comparing 90 substance use disorder treatment facilities acquired by private equity to 2,374 non-acquired controls between 2019 and 2021, acquisition was associated with substantially higher buprenorphine patient volumes but with shorter treatment retention. Ninety-day retention fell about 6 percentage points and 180-day retention about 8 points after acquisition, suggesting that more patients may have started care but fewer remained in treatment long enough to meet retention benchmarks typically associated with clinical benefit.</description><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><doi>10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.0250</doi><category>private equity</category><category>buprenorphine</category><category>treatment retention</category><category>substance use disorder</category><category>industrial organization</category><category>difference-in-differences</category><category>treatment quality</category><category>health services research</category><author>Holdaway T, Busch SH, Reimer J, Beetham T, Fiellin DA, King M</author></item><item><title>Medicaid: Increased Patient Access To MOUD In Residential Treatment Associated With Facility Openings And Closures, 2012–22</title><link>https://www.tamarabeetham.com/publications/medicaid-increased-patient-access-to-moud-in-residential-treatment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.tamarabeetham.com/publications/medicaid-increased-patient-access-to-moud-in-residential-treatment/</guid><description>After Medicaid Section 1115 waivers let states pay for residential addiction treatment, facilities in waiver states became 26 percentage points more likely to both accept Medicaid and offer FDA-approved opioid use disorder medications. Notably, nearly 90% of the access improvement came not from existing facilities changing their practices but from new facilities opening and others closing. Policy designs and evaluations that ignore market entry and exit may under- or over-predict their own effects.</description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><doi>10.1377/hlthaff.2025.00348</doi><category>Medicaid</category><category>Section 1115 waiver</category><category>MOUD</category><category>residential treatment</category><category>facility entry and exit</category><category>industrial organization</category><category>difference-in-differences</category><category>health policy</category><author>Beetham T, Newton H, Ndumele C, Fiellin DA, Busch S</author></item><item><title>Is access to crisis teams associated with changes in behavioral health mortality?</title><link>https://www.tamarabeetham.com/publications/is-access-to-crisis-teams-associated-with-changes-in-behavioral/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.tamarabeetham.com/publications/is-access-to-crisis-teams-associated-with-changes-in-behavioral/</guid><description>Linking changes in county-level access to behavioral health crisis teams to changes in mortality from 2014 to 2019, crisis-team entry was associated with a 7% reduction in county drug overdose deaths, while crisis-team closure was associated with a 13% increase. Suicide and acute alcohol mortality showed no significant associations. The findings suggest crisis teams may be one lever for narrowing gaps in substance use treatment.</description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><doi>10.1093/haschl/qxaf003</doi><category>behavioral health</category><category>crisis intervention</category><category>drug overdose</category><category>first responders</category><category>mental health policy</category><category>county-level analysis</category><category>substance use disorder</category><category>988 lifeline</category><author>Newton H, Beetham T, Busch S</author></item><item><title>Availability of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in US Psychiatric Hospitals</title><link>https://www.tamarabeetham.com/publications/availability-of-medications-for-opioid-use-disorder-in-us-psychiatric/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.tamarabeetham.com/publications/availability-of-medications-for-opioid-use-disorder-in-us-psychiatric/</guid><description>This cross-sectional study examines whether US psychiatric hospitals, which frequently admit patients with co-occurring opioid use disorder, offer FDA-approved medications for that condition.</description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><doi>10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44679</doi><category>psychiatric hospitals</category><category>MOUD</category><category>opioid use disorder</category><category>behavioral health integration</category><category>inpatient care</category><category>co-occurring disorders</category><category>treatment availability</category><author>Beetham T*, Cohen SM*, Fiellin DA, Muvvala SB</author></item><item><title>Access to Treatment Before and After Medicare Coverage of Opioid Treatment Programs</title><link>https://www.tamarabeetham.com/publications/access-to-treatment-before-and-after-medicare-coverage-of-opioid/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.tamarabeetham.com/publications/access-to-treatment-before-and-after-medicare-coverage-of-opioid/</guid><description>After Medicare began covering opioid treatment programs in 2020, the share of OTPs accepting Medicare jumped from 21% in 2018 to 81% by 2021. County-level access improved overall, with somewhat larger gains in counties with higher non-White populations. Availability of ancillary services such as HIV/AIDS education, employment services, and comprehensive mental health assessment did not increase, suggesting that Medicare coverage expanded enrollment access without expanding the underlying scope of services available to beneficiaries.</description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><doi>10.1093/haschl/qxae076</doi><category>Medicare</category><category>opioid treatment program</category><category>methadone</category><category>OUD treatment</category><category>health equity</category><category>ancillary services</category><category>policy evaluation</category><author>Liu R, Beetham T, Newton H, Busch S</author></item><item><title>Adolescent Residential Addiction Treatment in the US: Uneven Access, Waitlists, and High Costs</title><link>https://www.tamarabeetham.com/publications/adolescent-residential-addiction-treatment-in-the-us-uneven-access/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.tamarabeetham.com/publications/adolescent-residential-addiction-treatment-in-the-us-uneven-access/</guid><description>Posing as the aunt or uncle of a 16-year-old recovering from a non-fatal overdose, we called 160 US residential addiction facilities serving adolescents. Just over half had immediate beds; among the rest, the average waitlist was 28 days. Average daily cost was $878, with for-profit facilities charging roughly three times the nonprofit average. Half of facilities required up-front payment averaging $28,731. Ten states and DC had no identifiable adolescent residential treatment options at all.</description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><doi>10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00777</doi><category>adolescent addiction treatment</category><category>residential treatment</category><category>waitlists</category><category>treatment cost</category><category>audit study</category><category>for-profit care</category><category>health equity</category><category>behavioral health</category><author>King C, Beetham T, Smith N, Englander H, Button D, Brown PCM, Hadland SE, Bagley SM, Wright OR, PT Korthuis, Cook R</author></item><item><title>Treatments Used Among Adolescent Residential Addiction Treatment Facilities in the US, 2022</title><link>https://www.tamarabeetham.com/publications/treatments-used-among-adolescent-residential-addiction-treatment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.tamarabeetham.com/publications/treatments-used-among-adolescent-residential-addiction-treatment/</guid><description>This research letter surveys US adolescent residential addiction treatment facilities to assess which treatments, including FDA-approved medications for opioid use disorder, are offered to adolescents under 18.</description><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><doi>10.1001/jama.2023.6266</doi><category>adolescent addiction treatment</category><category>residential treatment</category><category>opioid use disorder</category><category>MOUD</category><category>treatment patterns</category><category>behavioral health</category><author>King C, Beetham T, Smith N, Englander H, Hadland SE, Bagley SM, PT Korthuis</author></item><item><title>Physician Response to COVID-19-driven Telehealth Flexibility for Opioid Use Disorder</title><link>https://www.tamarabeetham.com/publications/physician-response-to-covid-19-driven-telehealth-flexibility-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.tamarabeetham.com/publications/physician-response-to-covid-19-driven-telehealth-flexibility-for/</guid><description>Surveying 1,141 publicly registered buprenorphine prescribers in July 2020, telehealth use among physicians treating opioid use disorder more than doubled during the early pandemic (from 29% pre-COVID to 66%). Most found telehealth more effective than expected and 85% favored making the COVID-era flexibilities permanent. The findings indicate physician demand for the regulatory changes that have since informed national telehealth policy.</description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><doi>10.37765/ajmc.2022.89221</doi><category>telehealth</category><category>buprenorphine</category><category>physician survey</category><category>COVID-19</category><category>opioid use disorder</category><category>regulatory policy</category><category>DEA</category><category>access to care</category><author>Beetham T, Fiellin DA, Busch SH</author></item><item><title>Association of Access to Crisis Intervention Teams with County Sociodemographic Characteristics and State Medicaid Policies and Its Implications for a New Mental Health Crisis Lifeline</title><link>https://www.tamarabeetham.com/publications/association-of-access-to-crisis-intervention-teams-with-county/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.tamarabeetham.com/publications/association-of-access-to-crisis-intervention-teams-with-county/</guid><description>Before the launch of the 988 mental health crisis lifeline, we mapped county-level access to crisis intervention teams (trained behavioral health first responders) across 3,142 US counties. Although 88% of residents lived in a county with at least one CIT-equipped facility, half of all counties had none, and gaps concentrated in rural counties and in states without Medicaid expansion. Without targeted policy attention to these gaps, the lifeline&apos;s promise may go unrealized in the places where it is most needed.</description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><doi>10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.24803</doi><category>988 lifeline</category><category>crisis intervention teams</category><category>behavioral health crisis</category><category>rural health</category><category>Medicaid expansion</category><category>first responders</category><category>mental health access</category><author>Newton H, Beetham T, Busch SH</author></item><item><title>Admission Practices and Cost of Care for Opioid Use Disorder at Residential Addiction Treatment Programs in the US</title><link>https://www.tamarabeetham.com/publications/admission-practices-and-cost-of-care-for-opioid-use-disorder-at/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.tamarabeetham.com/publications/admission-practices-and-cost-of-care-for-opioid-use-disorder-at/</guid><description>Posing as uninsured cash-paying individuals using heroin, we called 613 US residential addiction treatment programs. One-third of callers were offered admission before any clinical evaluation, often within a day. Up-front payments averaged over $17,000 at for-profit programs, roughly three times the nonprofit average, and aggressive recruitment practices were common, including at accredited and state-licensed facilities. The findings raise concerns that financially and clinically vulnerable patients may be routed into costly care without thorough clinical assessment of whether residential treatment is appropriate.</description><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2021 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><doi>10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00378</doi><category>residential addiction treatment</category><category>audit study</category><category>secret shopper</category><category>for-profit care</category><category>treatment cost</category><category>patient brokering</category><category>consumer protection</category><category>industrial organization</category><author>Beetham T, Saloner B, Gaye M, Wakeman SE, Frank RG, Barnett M</author></item><item><title>Therapies Offered at Residential Addiction Treatment Programs in the US</title><link>https://www.tamarabeetham.com/publications/therapies-offered-at-residential-addiction-treatment-programs-in-the/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.tamarabeetham.com/publications/therapies-offered-at-residential-addiction-treatment-programs-in-the/</guid><description>Using simulated-patient calls to a random sample of US residential addiction facilities, this research letter examines which evidence-based treatments, such as buprenorphine-naloxone and nonpharmacologic therapies including CBT, are available for opioid use disorder, and how availability differs between for-profit and nonprofit centers.</description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><doi>10.1001/jama.2020.8969</doi><category>residential addiction treatment</category><category>MOUD</category><category>buprenorphine</category><category>evidence-based treatment</category><category>for-profit care</category><category>audit study</category><category>treatment quality</category><category>DATA Waiver</category><author>Beetham T, Saloner B, Gaye M, Wakeman SE, Frank RG, Barnett M</author></item><item><title>Access to office-based buprenorphine treatment in areas with high opioid-related mortality: an audit study</title><link>https://www.tamarabeetham.com/publications/access-to-office-based-buprenorphine-treatment-in-areas-with-high/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.tamarabeetham.com/publications/access-to-office-based-buprenorphine-treatment-in-areas-with-high/</guid><description>Posing as uninsured or Medicaid-covered patients reporting active heroin use, we made 1,092 calls to 546 buprenorphine prescribers across six high-mortality jurisdictions. About half of Medicaid contacts were offered any new appointment, but only 27% were offered one with the possibility of starting buprenorphine at the first visit. Wait times when appointments were offered were short (median 6 days), suggesting existing prescribers may have additional capacity that current screening practices do not reach.</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><doi>10.7326/M18-3457</doi><category>buprenorphine</category><category>opioid use disorder</category><category>audit study</category><category>secret shopper</category><category>Medicaid</category><category>access to care</category><category>DATA Waiver</category><category>health policy</category><author>Beetham T, Saloner B, Wakeman SE, Gaye M, Barnett M</author></item><item><title>Buprenorphine Prior Authorization Removal: Low Hanging Fruit in the Opioid Overdose Crisis</title><link>https://www.tamarabeetham.com/publications/buprenorphine-prior-authorization-removal-low-hanging-fruit-in-the/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.tamarabeetham.com/publications/buprenorphine-prior-authorization-removal-low-hanging-fruit-in-the/</guid><description>A commentary arguing that one of the most underused policy levers in the opioid overdose crisis is the simplest: removing the prior-authorization requirements that delay buprenorphine access for patients who most need it.</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><doi>10.54111/0001/Y2</doi><category>buprenorphine</category><category>prior authorization</category><category>Medicaid</category><category>OUD treatment</category><category>policy commentary</category><category>addiction treatment access</category><author>Beetham T</author></item><item><title>Deficits in visual working-memory capacity and general cognition in African Americans with psychosis</title><link>https://www.tamarabeetham.com/publications/deficits-in-visual-working-memory-capacity-and-general-cognition-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.tamarabeetham.com/publications/deficits-in-visual-working-memory-capacity-and-general-cognition-in/</guid><description>Comparing 79 patients with psychotic disorders to 166 controls (all African American), this study used Bayesian cognitive modeling to test whether the apparent visual working-memory deficit in psychosis is specific or part of a broader cognitive deficit. Reduced working-memory capacity was specific, exceeding what overall cognitive ability could explain, and partially mediated the broader cognitive deficit observed in psychosis.</description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2018 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><doi>10.1016/j.schres.2017.08.015</doi><category>psychosis</category><category>schizophrenia</category><category>visual working memory</category><category>cognitive neuroscience</category><category>Bayesian modeling</category><category>neurocognition</category><author>Mathias SR, Knowles EEM, Barrett J, Beetham T, Leach O, Buccheri S, Aberizk K, Blangero J, Poldrack RA, Glahn DC</author></item><item><title>Inferring pathobiology from structural MRI in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Modeling head motion and neuroanatomical specificity</title><link>https://www.tamarabeetham.com/publications/inferring-pathobiology-from-structural-mri-in-schizophrenia-and/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.tamarabeetham.com/publications/inferring-pathobiology-from-structural-mri-in-schizophrenia-and/</guid><description>Across 226 patients with schizophrenia, 227 with bipolar disorder, and 370 healthy controls scanned on the same MRI, head motion explained a substantial portion, though not all, of the structural brain differences typically attributed to these illnesses. After accounting for global cortical measures, regional specificity largely vanished, raising questions about whether structural MRI captures regionally specific pathology in psychotic and affective illness.</description><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><doi>10.1002/hbm.23612</doi><category>schizophrenia</category><category>bipolar disorder</category><category>structural MRI</category><category>head motion</category><category>cortical thickness</category><category>neuroimaging methodology</category><author>Yao N, Winkler AM, Barrett J, Book GA, Beetham T, Horseman R, Leach O, Hodgson K, Knowles EM, Mathias S, Stevens MC, Assaf M, van Erp TGM, Pearlson GD, Glahn DC</author></item><item><title>The Processing-Speed Impairment in Psychosis Is More Than Just Accelerated Aging</title><link>https://www.tamarabeetham.com/publications/the-processing-speed-impairment-in-psychosis-is-more-than-just/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.tamarabeetham.com/publications/the-processing-speed-impairment-in-psychosis-is-more-than-just/</guid><description>Comparing 51 patients with psychotic illness to 90 IQ-matched controls (all African American) on a digit-symbol coding task analyzed via drift-diffusion modeling, this study tested whether the processing-speed deficit in psychosis is the same phenomenon as age-related slowing. It is not: psychosis lowered information-processing efficiency, while normal aging primarily increased response caution, indicating divergent cognitive mechanisms.</description><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><doi>10.1093/schbul/sbw168</doi><category>psychosis</category><category>schizophrenia</category><category>processing speed</category><category>drift-diffusion model</category><category>Bayesian inference</category><category>cognitive aging</category><author>Mathias SR, Knowles EM, Barrett J, Leach O, Buccheri S, Beetham T, Blangero J, Poldrack RA, Glahn DC</author></item></channel></rss>